Papers in the archives are still worth far more than children

In general, the only thing the law does is change the side of the force. People who were once oppressed become the oppressors, simply because they were arguing that they were oppressed. Just as the commentators are divided between those who have only arguments in favor of a resolution and those who only have negative arguments. The balance cost much to stay in balance. For example, among the evil of those who suffer because they have no place to live, are those that invade the farms where they build without public permissions, moreover steal water and electricity, and even welcomed by the public as if they were discriminated against people (of course in exchange for votes in upcoming elections. It's always easy to position itself as defender of the poor in these moments, in a society so full of wants and desires rambling). Receiving public funds to complete their building and have its land occupied illegally legalized. However, people who build their house slowly with the stress of their work, having a legacy portion to be built by the descendants and did everything within the legal requirements, which won awards? Taxes and a troubled neighborhood without commitment to the place where they live. Built in a hurry, the pace of electoral campaigns, not worrying about the impacts to the environment. This is awarded by the government to redress social policies. Reparation for what? Justice or injustice? We find many who say they are discriminated because of their sexual orientation, but it is easy to see that some options that are unconventional, are now successful, often more than those who remain in the family traditions. Sex, or sex, are somehow linked to trade, since the same sex and reproduction has become big business. And so is being treated. And like other businesses, the market for reasons of profit can support the business as a complement, or rejects it as a competition that should be prevented even by violence. So is the business world. Of course, there are even those who suffer violence from their sexual choice, but do these also are not violated, and much more, for engaging in violent situations by themselves. So the problem is no longer discrimination and becomes the violence itself. Would those who say they are not also oppressed oppressors? Or at least when placed in a situation of oppressors, they do not behave exactly against those who criticized when it was oppressed? Well in that case, the law may be, under the beautiful argument of protecting the weak, giving new force to tyrants. Will - these movements - do not happen, just because some try to destroy their prospective enemies, encouraging - those characters and those ideas - which are most promising to destroy them? In a cynical attitude, usual, the mayor of Rio de Janeiro - said that - soon after the attack at school Tasso - do not hire janitors, or inspectors to the municipal schools, being schools, he said, open spaces of the citizen. Now he backtracked. That's because there was much pressure from the public (voters), due to exaggeration of the mayor to leave schools completely unguarded. Yesterday I went to the State of Judicial Forum Rio de Janeiro and then I was searched in every way by police and cameras, x-rays and so on. So I asked: what's so valuable is stored in that fortress. And then I received a cold response: papers. It seems that in our world papers in the archives are still worth far more than children.